Diversified research. One standard of discipline.

Verimont researches systematic opportunities in liquid US equities through independent mandates, centralized risk, and evidence reconciled against the paper accounts each order was worked in. All long-only; no capital is deployed.

A handful of hypotheses, each run three ways

Equity returns are decomposed into the sources a daily-bar book can actually reach. Since September 2026 four engines remain — trend, volatility-managed exposure, channel breakout and fundamental rotation — each run on three separate ten-name buckets and against three controls, so that when one fails we learn which part of the idea failed. The sector-relative and relative-momentum families that preceded them were retired after failing their own replays.

Separated so results stay attributable

Each arm records its own decisions under its own identifier, and a variant differs from its sibling by one deliberate change. Overlap stays visible rather than being discovered later.

Systematic execution research

Rules are defined before observation, measured through paper execution, and evaluated after realistic trading costs and operational failures.

Risk before return

Position, exposure, drawdown, and portfolio controls govern every mandate. No model may increase its own authority.

Research status

No capital is deployed and there is no track record. Since 16 September 2026 fifteen isolated $100,000 paper accounts work the rules at the close on real prices with simulated money, so that execution can be measured rather than assumed. Paper results are experimental, are not a track record, and may differ materially from live execution.

Evidence standard

Mandates advance only through prospective observation, sufficient sample depth, cost-adjusted results, and explicit human approval.

Confidential process

Public information describes the framework. Detailed signals, parameters, universes, and decision rules remain private.